The Machineries of Democracy: Failed Trust, Elections in Courts


Submitted by jsebes on November 4, 2008 - 6:20pm. PST

As you might imagine, it is hard to choose from the many events of Election Day 2008 to report and reflect on! But I thought that I’d pick a handful of events that show just how vitally important it is the election equipment be designed carefully – and the consequences of products that aren’t, and vendors that don’t seem to care. I have to say, it’s potentially dire, which is why I’ve picked as many as 3 events to support my claims.


A first: election system vendors admits losing votes


Submitted by jsebes on August 26, 2008 - 1:31pm. PST

Here is a first-ever admission: a real software bug in a real voting system can drop real votes, and has dropped votes. And perhaps has been doing so for years. I wrote earlier about the wrangle between the state of Ohio and Premier Election Systems (formerly Diebold), in which some real vote dropping was blamed on anti-virus software (which wasn't allowed to be in the machines in the first place!).


Syndicate content

Fundamentally re-inventing digital voting technology.

From the Blog

Re-inventing How America Votes -- Now More Relevant Than Ever


In a previous post, I noted two things we've learned from this election. The first (and subject of that

Re-inventing How America Votes -- Now More Relevant Than Ever


In a previous post, I noted two things we've learned from this election. The first (and subject of that